지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This is a study on the value of Chophae shino as a material for linguistic study focusing on its linguistic characteristics and status (including abuse of dialect). As mentioned in the previous study, the status of Chophae shino in linguistic terms can be considered from 3 main aspects: (1) the influence of Kyushu dialect (2) Kyoto dialect (3) misuse by the interference of the mother tongue and incompetence in Japanese language
Each aspect has enough probability. But concerning (3) misuse by the interference of the mother tongue (of the author) and incompetence in Japanese language, there seemed to be a need for a more sociolinguistic approach and accordingly such an approach was tried in this study.
First of all, the Japanese version has 「kureru」and 「kutasaru」which have been revised from the original 「yaru」and 「yarasiraru」as in the example 1 and example 2. There are many cases of 「～(a)si ‘sasi’ raru」format, which is also a very rare format in the writing at that time. But examples of these features are found in Hirano (1964) and modern dialects (Fukuoka, Saga, Kumamoto).
The Korean version has similar tendency to that of the Japanese version. One example is the case of「-Siso」(uniting ending) for request and describing) and noun indication . The published version has as many as 11 times of 「-Siso」form. Tae-young Lee (1997) points out that it is a characteristic of ‘Southeast dialect (of Korea)’. And
Now that a long time has passed, there are is definite material in both the Korean and Japanese languages to provide a reliable definition. It is not known up to now in which place of Japan the author had served his sentence. The only thing we can do is to presume that the author might have stayed in areas in which Kyushu dialect is spoken (especially Fukuoka and Saga). It is unfortunate that the limitations of data prevent further discussion. More research may be needed on this subject as well as on linguistic phenomena unidentified so far.
Each aspect has enough probability. But concerning (3) misuse by the interference of the mother tongue (of the author) and incompetence in Japanese language, there seemed to be a need for a more sociolinguistic approach and accordingly such an approach was tried in this study.
First of all, the Japanese version has 「kureru」and 「kutasaru」which have been revised from the original 「yaru」and 「yarasiraru」as in the example 1 and example 2. There are many cases of 「～(a)si ‘sasi’ raru」format, which is also a very rare format in the writing at that time. But examples of these features are found in Hirano (1964) and modern dialects (Fukuoka, Saga, Kumamoto).
The Korean version has similar tendency to that of the Japanese version. One example is the case of「-Siso」(uniting ending) for request and describing) and noun indication . The published version has as many as 11 times of 「-Siso」form. Tae-young Lee (1997) points out that it is a characteristic of ‘Southeast dialect (of Korea)’. And
Now that a long time has passed, there are is definite material in both the Korean and Japanese languages to provide a reliable definition. It is not known up to now in which place of Japan the author had served his sentence. The only thing we can do is to presume that the author might have stayed in areas in which Kyushu dialect is spoken (especially Fukuoka and Saga). It is unfortunate that the limitations of data prevent further discussion. More research may be needed on this subject as well as on linguistic phenomena unidentified so far.
목차
Abstract
1. 머리말
2. 原刊本에 보이는 언어적 특징
3. 日本語
4. 韓國語
5. 마무리
參考文獻
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서남방언의 하위방언구획과 네트워크 분석
언어학
2017 .04
-
지역 위기 극복을 위한 방언콘텐츠 계발 방안
국어문학
2022 .07
-
한어방언 어휘에 나타난 ‘番’, ‘紅毛’, ‘荷蘭’에 관한 소고
중국언어연구
2015 .11
-
중국어 방언섬의 형성과 사멸 - 우 · 후이 방언 지역을 예로
중국어문논역총간
2024 .07
-
새로 발굴한 경북의성지역어의 어휘
국어교육연구
2016 .02
-
서울 거주 방언 화자의 코드 선택 양상 - 20∼30대 경상도 출신 방언 화자를 중심으로 -
언어사실과 관점
2016 .01
-
Analyzing vowel variation in Korean dialects using phone recognition
말소리와 음성과학
2023 .12
-
경북 서북지역의 방언 분포 통계 분석 연구 - 방언 분포 통계분석법 적용 -
한말연구
2024 .05
-
Perceptual Dialectology and Language Attitudes : A View from Gyeongsang Dialect Speakers
언어과학연구
2015 .12
-
국어사전과 방언의 정보화
국어문학
2016 .03
-
漢語蘇州方言和合肥方言入聲字的比較研究
중국학
2019 .01
-
한국어 방언 음운론 연구의 흐름 - 2000년대 이후의 연구 성과를 중심으로 -
언어학
2024 .12
-
Hierarchical Relationship between the Seoul Dialect and Non-Mainstream Dialects of Korea in a TV Show
언어과학연구
2021 .03
-
부산지역 대학생들의 어휘 표준어화와 언어 태도
어문학
2019 .06
-
Analysis of Koreans' Overt and Covert Language Attitudes towards Jeju Dialect
언어정보
2019 .01
-
Comprehension and accuracy in consecutive interpreting from Jeju dialect to English
통역과 번역
2021 .01
-
현대국어 母音 ‘어’의 音價 고찰
방언학
2015 .01
-
漢語方言 어음 연구의 이론적 배경
중국학논총
2019 .01
-
방언 어휘 대조 연구 방법 시고(試考)
한말연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-913-002156380