이 연구는 운동선수들이 인식하는 선호 코칭행동과 실제 코칭행동의 차이를 알아보고, 지도자의 진성리더십이 코칭행동에 미치는 영향을 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 학교급별 스포츠팀에 소속된 선수 234명을 편의표본추출법을 사용하여 추출하였다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 독립표본 t-검정, 일원배치분산분석(One-way ANOVA), 단계적 회귀분석을 실시하였고, 이를 통한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 코칭행동평가체계 범주 간 정·부적 상관이 나타났다. 둘째, 지도자의 실제 코칭행동과 선호 코칭행동에서 강화/설명/조직/처벌/통제. 처벌적 기술지도/무강화에서 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 셋째, 경력에 따라 실제 코칭행동(강화/무강화/실수 후 기술지도/처벌적 기술지도/ 통제/일반적 격려)과 선호행동(강화/무강화/처벌/처벌적 기술지도)에서 차이가 나타났다. 넷째, 진성리더십의 인간적 소통, 자기성장은 실제 코칭행동의 강화 · 지도영역(+), 처벌 · 통제 영역(-)과 선호 코칭행동의 강화 · 지도영역(+)에 영향을 미치며, 인간적 소통은 선호 코칭행동 중 처벌 · 통제영역에 부(+)적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 지도자의 처벌 · 통제 행동은 선수들에게 부정적인 영향을 미치며, 강화·지도 행동은 긍정적인 영향을 미치기 때문에 지도자는 선수와의 긍정적 관계나 태도를 형성하기 위해 강화 · 지도 행동에 중점을 두는 지도법을 활용하여 지도 효율성을 높일 필요가 있다.
The purpose of this study was to find out the difference between preference coaching behavior and actual coaching behavior by players, and to find out the effect of leaders" authentic leadership on coaching behavior. The subjects of the study were 234 people belonging to sports teams by school level, and through the questionnaire, authentic leadership and coaching behavior assessment system were used. The SPSS 26.0 program was used for data processing, and a independent two sample t-test, One-way analysis of variance and a stepwise regression analysis were conducted to find out the effect on variables. As a result of the study, first, The positive correlation was found between the categories of positive coaching behavior among the categories of the Coaching Behavior Assessment System(CBAS), and negative correlations was found between negative coaching behavior and positive coaching behavior. Second, There were negative(-) differences in reinforcement, explanation in actual coaching behavior and preferred coaching behavior, and positive (+) differences in organization/punishment/control/punitive technical guidance/non-reinforcement. Third, actual coaching behaviors according to career showed differences in reinforcement/non-reinforcement/mistake technical guidance/punitive technical guidance/control/general encouragement, and preference behaviors showed differences in reinforcement/non-reinforcement /punishment/technical guidance after punishment. Fourth, Authentic leadership(human communication, self-growth) was found to have a positive (+) effect on the reinforcement and guidance areas of actual coaching behavior, and had a negative (-) effect on the punishment and control areas. In addition, Authentic leadership(human communication, self-growth) has a positive (+) effect on reinforcement and guidance areas of preferred coaching behavior, and genuine leadership (human communication) has a negative (+) effect on punishment/control. In conclusion, it was found that the more the punishment control area was shown, the more negative the effect was on the player, and the more positive the guidance was based on the reinforcement guidance area. Therefore, in order to form positive relationships and attitudes with players, the efficiency of guidance can be increased by using the guidance method in the reinforced guidance area rather than the punishment control area guidance method.